33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives in the police should be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, assure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender plus the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
A reduced court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it's unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If your court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it may possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts on the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which includes These in clear violation of founded case legislation) for the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, and also the case is not really appealed, the decision will stand.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed on the disposal of the instant petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and also private respondents and will consider care of every one of the components of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. In the meantime police shall remain neutral within the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal click here action the police shall consider prompt action against them under legislation. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents in the boy or Female tend not to approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they might do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court as well as the Court of Appeals are routinely available. Decisions in the lower (trial) courts are certainly not generally published or distributed.
Article 27 on the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment too. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the distinct negation with the legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party as well as the case shall be decided by the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this element for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not complete, but this is an excellent starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.